Monday, August 10, 2020

Monthly Archives: July, 2020

- Advertisement -

Towards An Anti-Zoo Jurisprudence (1/2)

Part I of the article introduces the changing judicial landscape of animal rights. It analyses the negative impact of zoos on the physical and mental well-being of animals. [...]

Experiences with Pluralist Stakeholder Model in India: For Whom Should a Company be Run?

This article seeks to trace the emergence and operation of a stakeholder model of corporate governance in India, that is sourced in directors’ fiduciary duties, Corporate Social Responsibility [‘CSR’], and the agency of Independent Directors [‘IDs’]

Judicial Interference and the IBC: The case of Embassy Property Developments

While the law has been overhauled through the passage of the IBC, the trajectory of court interference is one that has to been seen in the coming few years. However, if the early signs are indicative of anything, it is that the judiciary has not learnt from the failure of the SICA regime – judicial interference continues unabated. [...]
- Advertisement -

Must Read

Towards An Anti-Zoo Jurisprudence (2/2)

Part II of the article critiques the traditional justifications for animal captivity in zoos. It further juxtaposes these justifications with an emerging anti-captivity jurisprudence. Section 38A of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 provides for the establishment of the Central Zoo Authority (CZA). [...]
- Advertisement -

Towards An Anti-Zoo Jurisprudence (1/2)

Part I of the article introduces the changing judicial landscape of animal rights. It analyses the negative impact of zoos on the physical and mental well-being of animals. [...]

Experiences with Pluralist Stakeholder Model in India: For Whom Should a Company be Run?

This article seeks to trace the emergence and operation of a stakeholder model of corporate governance in India, that is sourced in directors’ fiduciary duties, Corporate Social Responsibility [‘CSR’], and the agency of Independent Directors [‘IDs’]